विषय पर बढ़ें

Compliance Posture

OpenMed provides evidence for local validation: audit reports, leakage metrics, residual-risk scores, reproducible benchmark runs, and policy-profile outputs. OpenMed does not self-certify compliance. Users validate against their own data, jurisdiction, deployment controls, and counsel.

No de-identification tool can guarantee compliance or zero residual risk. Validate locally before any production or clinical use.

If you find a case where identifiers leak — a redaction bypass — treat it as a security issue and report it privately through the Security & Disclosure policy, never as a public issue, and without including real patient data.

Framework Split

Framework What OpenMed supplies What the user still owns
HIPAA Safe Harbor (policy="hipaa_safe_harbor") Profile mapping CANONICAL_LABELS to the 18 identifier classes, many-to-one; per-class leakage metrics; audit trail. Confirming all 18 classes for their data; the "no actual knowledge" judgment.
HIPAA Expert Determination (policy="hipaa_expert_review_assist") Advisory quasi-identifier discovery, patient-level k/l/t measurement and transformation, materialized-output validation, reproducible leakage and residual-risk results, and aggregate expert-review evidence. Selecting a qualified expert; reviewing population, auxiliary data, release context, composition, methods, thresholds, and utility; documenting and signing the determination.
GDPR pseudonymization (policy="gdpr_pseudonymization") Reversible replace with separable key mapping; deterministic surrogates; transform audit. Key custody, re-id governance, lawful basis, DPIA.
EU AI Act high-risk Logging through audit reports, documentation through cards, human oversight through review bundles, robustness through harness and golden suites, and cybersecurity through signing, local-only execution, and no raw logging. Conformity assessment, registration, and deployment obligations.
  • Structured release risk and expert-review evidence documents advisory quasi-identifier discovery, complete patient-level k/l/t assessment, generalization and suppression, materialized-output validation, and aggregate-only evidence for qualified expert review.
  • Audit reports provide deterministic span provenance, residual-risk snapshots, manifest hashes, and optional signatures for de-identification runs.
  • Leakage metrics are emitted in BenchmarkReport output for reproducible benchmark runs.
  • Residual re-identification risk reports leakage and auxiliary linkage risk for text or table records.
  • Policy profiles capture the canonical policy literals and default action posture used by the runtime.
  • Pan-African Malabo Convention baseline maps Article 14(1) sensitive-data categories to conservative, non-keep canonical-label actions while preserving national-law precedence.

Deployment Templates

These artifacts are templates requiring legal review, not legal advice. Adapt them to the actual parties, purpose, data, jurisdiction, deployment boundaries, and supervisory-authority guidance:

Policy Literals

Use these exact literals in docs, examples, and deployment configuration:

Literal Posture Default action bias Arbitration mode
hipaa_safe_harbor Redact all 18 HIPAA identifiers, no exceptions. remove/mask High-recall union; safety sweep mandatory; residual-risk ~0.
hipaa_expert_review_assist Flag + surrogate, leave clinical content; produce expert-review audit. replace surrogates Balanced, with reviewer escalation on low confidence.
gdpr_pseudonymization Reversible pseudonyms, mapping retained under key. replace + reversible_id Balanced; keep_mapping=True; HMAC reversible IDs.
africa_malabo_baseline Conservative Article 14(1) sensitive-data baseline; national law prevails where stricter. mask High-recall union; safety sweep mandatory; no replacement mapping.
india_health_id Fully redact ABHA, ABHA Address, context-confirmed UPI, and ration-card identifiers in clinical records. mask High-recall union; safety sweep mandatory; raw identifier logging forbidden.